Tuesday, May 09, 2006

FIRST EL AL HOTTY CONTEST!

According to an article cited by Dovbear, two leading rabbis [The Gerrer Rebbe and Aharon Leib Steinman] buy up all first class tickets and ask El Al to only post male stewards on flights so they do not have to see women on their way to America.


[Here's the article: http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3248854,00.html and here's Dovbear's post: http://dovbear.blogspot.com/2006/05/what-unbelievable-waste-of-money.html ]


This is because the mere sight of a woman can send a tzaddik into fits of pritzusdikkeite passion. The poor dear has no self control, you see, and appreciates the beauty of ALL of Hashem's creations.

Even El Al Stewardesses.

And even though he's ninety years old.

[A ninety year old having untzniusdikke gedachten? Kol Ha Kavod!!!! The only ninety year old I know drools into his beard and dribbles his prunes and chummus onto his bekeshe when his head wobbles! I am full of admiration for a ninety year old who still has aza lead in his pencil. A tzaddik like that I should be when I'm his age! Mamesh!]


SO, IN ADMIRATION OF THESE TWO ZESTY REBBEIM, AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF A MAJOR TRAVEL PROBLEM FOR FRUMMERLEITE, THIS BLOG ANNOUNCES THE FIRST EVER HOT EL AL MAMA CONTEST!


[Both as a warning, and as a joy to behold]

Please nominate your choice for hottest El Al Stewardess, and explain in an essay of one hundred descriptive words or more why you think she is the candidate most likely to disturb a Chassidic rebbe's spiritual equilibrium.



Accounts of flights to the Holy Land spent in an agony of frustration are also welcome. As are tales of being unspiritual while waiting in line to board ("ooh, those shapely ankles, that tempting sheitel, I cannot take it anymore, ooooh!").
[The winning entry will be decided by me, based on my totally fair and balanced judgement. Providing links to photos is not necessary, this is a clean blog after all, but is greatly encouraged nevertheless. The winner gets to guest-post five times, the second runner up three times, and the third prize is one guest post. There will be no cash prizes, nor any pay-outs in lieu of posting - I'm a monumental cheapskate (I'm Dutch, remember?). Multiple entries per contestant are allowed, plagiarism is not a problem in the comments - it's your lookout.]


------ ------ ------ ------ ------

NOTE:
Shir HaShirim is all about looking at women (yes, I know, a metaphor for the relationship between Israel and Hashem, but face it, that explanation merely says that you're all his bitch. So back to the pshuta, please).

A rebbe cannot wear sun-glasses? A rebbe cannot divert his eyes and his mind from a shapely ankle? A rebbe might turn into a beast if distracted by a passing snooky?
What kind of a rebbe is this?!?!?!?!?


[How on earth would these prudes have coped with the women of the Tanach? Sarah Imaeinu was a hotty, Rivka was a hotty....., and Delilah...... ?, Oy, Baruch Hashem! And Esther too! Woof! Bark, bark, bark! Woof! ]
Depose the bulgar, and get a rebbe who at least has a modicum of self-control and common sense.

Sheesh. Buncha puritanical protestants.
And that from such an illustrious yichus.

Monday, May 08, 2006

REPOSTING, SPELL CHECKED VERSON


I am pleased to provide space for a very good friend to guest post below. While Mordechai and I disagree on almost everything, that has not been an obstacle to a deep and enduring friendship for several years, and I respect his point of view. He is in town for a week, and what better time for a guest post than now? For reasons which should be obvious, Mordechai will only use his first name, and not mention the community in which he lives. I have encouraged him to put some of his thoughts into a blog - a suggestion I hope he will take seriously. ---B.O.T.H.

-------------------------------------------------------------

GUEST POST: Rabbosai, there is too much chillul Hashem on the internet. This is why our rabbis have decided that no one should have a computer in the home. But should a computer even be used for scholarly purposes? It has been said that there is much yiddishkeit available on the internet, and there are very good translations, of many precious works on web pages. But there is more on the internet than just good sources and reliable information - there is much violence, obscenity, and very many disturbing webpages. The bad by far outweighs the good.

If cigarettes and smoking are dangerous, if drugs and pictures of obscenity are dangerous, then how much more so uncontrolled surfing? It is much better that people should engage in study in a controlled environment, without the distraction of email and computers.

One who while studying is distracted is in the greatest danger. Many younger men have nearly destroyed their lives by engaging in compiuter. Something which which is so obviously bittul Torah and avodah zarah should not be encouraged. Please join me in speaking out against this - COMPUTERS ARE DANGEROUS, and their daily use should be strongly spoken against.

There is precedent (I am refering to the ban on the Rambam's works of course): in the past, when there were arguments over philosophy, the compromise reached was that men under twenty five years of age should not read science and metaphysics. This was a wise decision. Children do not have the wisdom and the experiance to distinguish between truth, truth, and falsehood. I thank my host for allowing me to write this on his blog.


----Mordechai.

ORTHODOX JEWS CELEBRATE CINCO DE MAYO!

Yes, I'm as flabbergasted as you are. But I assure you, it has to be true. For proof, look no further than the following exchange in the comments section on one of Dovbear's posts (http://dovbear.blogspot.com/2006/05/summer-projects.html).

If this isn't conclusive evidence of a whole bunch of nasty Tequila hangovers, I don't know what is.
And Rabbosai, let this be a lesson to stay away from Hornitos or Don Julio (and especially Cuervo, chosvesholem!), - better you should drink Oro Y Azul!



Naphtuli why don't you and CWY retire with Ezzie to the jacuzzi for a threesome. Or a fivesome if egos are counted.
Alex 05.08.06 - 2:29 pm # <http://www.haloscan.com/comments/dovbear/114710391935067484/>


Alex- what do you have against gay people?
Classmate-Wearing-Yarmulka Homepage <http://wearing-yarmulka.blogspot.com/> 05.08.06 - 2:32 pm # <http://www.haloscan.com/comments/dovbear/114710391935067484/>


CWY, Nothing, I am sure your father is a wonderful fellow.
Alex 05.08.06 - 2:32 pm # <http://www.haloscan.com/comments/dovbear/114710391935067484/>


Not that there's anything wrong with it.
Classmate-Wearing-Yarmulka Homepage <http://wearing-yarmulka.blogspot.com/> 05.08.06 - 2:33 pm # <http://www.haloscan.com/comments/dovbear/114710391935067484/>


Alex, you haven't insulted my mother yet.
Classmate-Wearing-Yarmulka Homepage <http://wearing-yarmulka.blogspot.com/> 05.08.06 - 2:36 pm # <http://www.haloscan.com/comments/dovbear/114710391935067484/>


It's be kind to dumb animals week
Alex 05.08.06 - 2:37 pm # <http://www.haloscan.com/comments/dovbear/114710391935067484/>


I thank you and your commenters for the fact that one need look no farther than this thread for prime examples of men being pigs. Assuming that pigs also pee on each other in addition to stinking and rolling around in feces and mud.
RenReb Homepage <http://www.renegaderebbetzin.blogspot.com/> 05.08.06 - 3:39 pm # <http://www.haloscan.com/comments/dovbear/114710391935067484/>


(oh - and grunting and snorting as a means of expression and communication)RenReb Homepage <http://www.renegaderebbetzin.blogspot.com/> 05.08.06 - 3:40 pm # <http://www.haloscan.com/comments/dovbear/114710391935067484/>


----- ----- ----- ----- -----

As Eric Cartman would say " I love you guys...."

MAY THEY ALL HAVE SONS LIKE THIS!

Expect a huge outcry demanding the release of Yisrael Vales.

Why?

Because he is manifestly innocent. As is conclusively proven by his having withdrawn his confession. Surely a frumme yungerman would not lie.

He's a brilliant scholar, why he's a veritable ilui, and a credit to his community, whose estimable rebbeyim have publicly proclaimed him innocent, averring that he's an angel, a dear sweet boy! And his police accusers are guilty of a blood-libel, and probably Arabs to boot, oh lack-a-day!


From Ha'aretz:
"Yisrael Vales, 19, is suspected of beating his son and throwing him against the wall because the baby's cries annoyed him. The infant died of his wounds in early April."



Please note: the baby had evidence of brain hemorrhaging, oedema, violent trauma, and bites on his body.

Attorney Avigdor Feldman told the Jerusalem District Court that he intends to examine the confession Vales gave his interrogators. He asserts that his client was pressured into confessing, being threatened with remaining in custody.

And surely this proves the innocence of the dear sweet angel?

A normal, cynically inclined secular human being would've realized that such a confession, rather than securing his release, would have guaranteed further custody. But Yisrael Vales is a talmid, and consequently not wise to the ways of the world.

Friday, May 05, 2006

GUEST POST FROM MORDECHAI N.

I am pleased to provide space for a very good friend to guest post below. While Mordechai and I disagree on almost everything, that has not been an obstacle to a deep and enduring friendship for several years, and I respect his point of view.

He is in town for a week, and what better time for a guest post than now?

For reasons which should be obvious, Mordechai will only use his first name, and not mention the community in which he lives. I have encouraged him to put some of his thoughts into a blog - a suggestion I hope he will take seriously.

---B.O.T.H.

-------------------------------------------------------------

GUEST POST:

Rabbosai, there is too much chillul Hashem on the internet. This is why our rabbis have decided that no one should have a compiuter in the home. But should a compiuter even be used for scholarly purposes? It has been said that there is much yiddishkeit available on the internet, and I have seen translations, very good translations, of many precious works on web pages. But the internet is more than just goodness - there is much violence, obscenity, and disturbing webpages. The bad outweighs the good.


If cigarettes and smoking are dangerous, if drugs and pictures of obscenity are dangerous, then how much more so uncontrolled surfing?
It is much better that people should engage in study in a controlled environment, without the disrtraction of email and computers.

One who while studying is distracted is in the greatest danger.
Many younger men have nearly destroyed their lives by engaging in compiuter. Something which which is so obviously bittul Torah and avodah zarah should not be encouraged. Please join me in speaking out against this - COMPIUTERS ARE DANGEROUS, and their daily use should be strongly spoken against.


There is precedent: in the past, when there were arguments over philosophy, the compromise reached was that men under twenty five years of age should not read science and metaphysics. This was a wise decision. Children do not have the wisdom and the experiance to distinguish between truth, truth, and falsehood.

I thank my host for allowing me to write this on his blog.

Mordechai.

A SURPLUS OF HOT SAUCE

I discovered the following text while researching the issue of illegal immigration.
While it clearly deals with a different time and place, the solution it provides can with only little modification be applied to our own most pressing problem, namely the vast numbers of illegals breaching our southern border.
I therefore venture to humbly suggest that we study this text well, internalize its lessons, and apply them with zest and a keen appetite to our present circumstance.

---B.OT.H.



---------------------------- - ----------------------------

It is a melancholy object to those who walk through this great town or travel in the country, when they see the streets, the roads, and cabin doors, crowded with beggars of the female sex, followed by three, four, or six children, all in rags and importuning every passenger for an alms. These mothers, instead of being able to work for their honest livelihood, are forced to employ all their time in strolling to beg sustenance for their helpless infants: who as they grow up either turn thieves for want of work, or leave their dear native country to fight for the Pretender in Spain, or sell themselves to the Barbadoes.


I think it is agreed by all parties that this prodigious number of children in the arms, or on the backs, or at the heels of their mothers, and frequently of their fathers, is in the present deplorable state of the kingdom a very great additional grievance; and, therefore, whoever could find out a fair, cheap, and easy method of making these children sound, useful members of the commonwealth, would deserve so well of the public as to have his statue set up for a preserver of the nation.


But my intention is very far from being confined to provide only for the children of professed beggars; it is of a much greater extent, and shall take in the whole number of infants at a certain age who are born of parents in effect as little able to support them as those who demand our charity in the streets.


As to my own part, having turned my thoughts for many years upon this important subject, and maturely weighed the several schemes of other projectors, I have always found them grossly mistaken in the computation. It is true, a child just dropped from its dam may be supported by her milk for a solar year, with little other nourishment; at most not above the value of 2s., which the mother may certainly get, or the value in scraps, by her lawful occupation of begging; and it is exactly at one year old that I propose to provide for them in such a manner as instead of being a charge upon their parents or the parish, or wanting food and raiment for the rest of their lives, they shall on the contrary contribute to the feeding, and partly to the clothing, of many thousands.


There is likewise another great advantage in my scheme, that it will prevent those voluntary abortions, and that horrid practice of women murdering their bastard children, alas! too frequent among us! sacrificing the poor innocent babes I doubt more to avoid the expense than the shame, which would move tears and pity in the most savage and inhuman breast.


The number of souls in this kingdom being usually reckoned one million and a half, of these I calculate there may be about two hundred thousand couple whose wives are breeders; from which number I subtract thirty thousand couples who are able to maintain their own children, although I apprehend there cannot be so many, under the present distresses of the kingdom; but this being granted, there will remain an hundred and seventy thousand breeders.


I again subtract fifty thousand for those women who miscarry, or whose children die by accident or disease within the year. There only remains one hundred and twenty thousand children of poor parents annually born. The question therefore is, how this number shall be reared and provided for, which, as I have already said, under the present situation of affairs, is utterly impossible by all the methods hitherto proposed. For we can neither employ them in handicraft or agriculture; we neither build houses (I mean in the country) nor cultivate land: they can very seldom pick up a livelihood by stealing, till they arrive at six years old, except where they are of towardly parts, although I confess they learn the rudiments much earlier, during which time, they can however be properly looked upon only as probationers, as I have been informed by a principal gentleman in the county of Cavan, who protested to me that he never knew above one or two instances under the age of six, even in a part of the kingdom so renowned for the quickest proficiency in that art.


I am assured by our merchants, that a boy or a girl before twelve years old is no salable commodity; and even when they come to this age they will not yield above three pounds, or three pounds and half-a-crown at most on the exchange; which cannot turn to account either to the parents or kingdom, the charge of nutriment and rags having been at least four times that value.


I shall now therefore humbly propose my own thoughts, which I hope will not be liable to the least objection. I have been assured by a very knowing American of my acquaintance in London, that a young healthy child well nursed is at a year old a most delicious, nourishing, and wholesome food, whether stewed, roasted, baked, or boiled; and I make no doubt that it will equally serve in a fricassee or a ragout.


I do therefore humbly offer it to public consideration that of the hundred and twenty thousand children already computed, twenty thousand may be reserved for breed, whereof only one-fourth part to be males; which is more than we allow to sheep, black cattle or swine; and my reason is, that these children are seldom the fruits of marriage, a circumstance not much regarded by our savages, therefore one male will be sufficient to serve four females. That the remaining hundred thousand may, at a year old, be offered in the sale to the persons of quality and fortune through the kingdom; always advising the mother to let them suck plentifully in the last month, so as to render them plump and fat for a good table.


A child will make two dishes at an entertainment for friends; and when the family dines alone, the fore or hind quarter will make a reasonable dish, and seasoned with a little pepper or salt will be very good boiled on the fourth day, especially in winter.


I have reckoned upon a medium that a child just born will weigh 12 pounds, and in a solar year, if tolerably nursed, increaseth to 28 pounds.
I grant this food will be somewhat dear, and therefore very proper for landlords, who, as they have already devoured most of the parents, seem to have the best title to the children.
Infant's flesh will be in season throughout the year, but more plentiful in March, and a little before and after; for we are told by a grave author, an eminent French physician, that fish being a prolific diet, there are more children born in Roman Catholic countries about nine months after Lent than at any other season; therefore, reckoning a year after Lent, the markets will be more glutted than usual, because the number of popish infants is at least three to one in this kingdom: and therefore it will have one other collateral advantage, by lessening the number of papists among us.


I have already computed the charge of nursing a beggar's child (in which list I reckon all cottagers, laborers, and four-fifths of the farmers) to be about two shillings per annum, rags included; and I believe no gentleman would repine to give ten shillings for the carcass of a good fat child, which, as I have said, will make four dishes of excellent nutritive meat, when he hath only some particular friend or his own family to dine with him. Thus the squire will learn to be a good landlord, and grow popular among his tenants; the mother will have eight shillings net profit, and be fit for work till she produces another child.


Those who are more thrifty (as I must confess the times require) may flay the carcass; the skin of which artificially dressed will make admirable gloves for ladies, and summer boots for fine gentlemen.


As to our city of Dublin, shambles may be appointed for this purpose in the most convenient parts of it, and butchers we may be assured will not be wanting; although I rather recommend buying the children alive, and dressing them hot from the knife, as we do roasting pigs.


A very worthy person, a true lover of his country, and whose virtues I highly esteem, was lately pleased in discoursing on this matter to offer a refinement upon my scheme. He said that many gentlemen of this kingdom, having of late destroyed their deer, he conceived that the want of venison might be well supplied by the bodies of young lads and maidens, not exceeding fourteen years of age nor under twelve; so great a number of both sexes in every country being now ready to starve for want of work and service; and these to be disposed of by their parents, if alive, or otherwise by their nearest relations. But with due deference to so excellent a friend and so deserving a patriot, I cannot be altogether in his sentiments; for as to the males, my American acquaintance assured me, from frequent experience, that their flesh was generally tough and lean, like that of our schoolboys by continual exercise, and their taste disagreeable; and to fatten them would not answer the charge.
Then as to the females, it would, I think, with humble submission be a loss to the public, because they soon would become breeders themselves; and besides, it is not improbable that some scrupulous people might be apt to censure such a practice (although indeed very unjustly), as a little bordering upon cruelty; which, I confess, hath always been with me the strongest objection against any project, however so well intended.


But in order to justify my friend, he confessed that this expedient was put into his head by the famous Psalmanazar, a native of the island Formosa, who came from thence to London above twenty years ago, and in conversation told my friend, that in his country when any young person happened to be put to death, the executioner sold the carcass to persons of quality as a prime dainty; and that in his time the body of a plump girl of fifteen, who was crucified for an attempt to poison the emperor, was sold to his imperial majesty's prime minister of state, and other great mandarins of the court, in joints from the gibbet, at four hundred crowns.


Neither indeed can I deny, that if the same use were made of several plump young girls in this town, who without one single groat to their fortunes cannot stir abroad without a chair, and appear at playhouse and assemblies in foreign fineries which they never will pay for, the kingdom would not be the worse.


Some persons of a desponding spirit are in great concern about that vast number of poor people, who are aged, diseased, or maimed, and I have been desired to employ my thoughts what course may be taken to ease the nation of so grievous an encumbrance. But I am not in the least pain upon that matter, because it is very well known that they are every day dying and rotting by cold and famine, and filth and vermin, as fast as can be reasonably expected. And as to the young laborers, they are now in as hopeful a condition; they cannot get work, and consequently pine away for want of nourishment, to a degree that if at any time they are accidentally hired to common labor, they have not strength to perform it; and thus the country and themselves are happily delivered from the evils to come.


I have too long digressed, and therefore shall return to my subject. I think the advantages by the proposal which I have made are obvious and many, as well as of the highest importance.


For first, as I have already observed, it would greatly lessen the number of papists, with whom we are yearly overrun, being the principal breeders of the nation as well as our most dangerous enemies; and who stay at home on purpose with a design to deliver the kingdom to the Pretender, hoping to take their advantage by the absence of so many good protestants, who have chosen rather to leave their country than stay at home and pay tithes against their conscience to an episcopal curate.


Secondly, The poorer tenants will have something valuable of their own, which by law may be made liable to distress and help to pay their landlord's rent, their corn and cattle being already seized, and money a thing unknown.


Thirdly, Whereas the maintenance of an hundred thousand children, from two years old and upward, cannot be computed at less than ten shillings a-piece per annum, the nation's stock will be thereby increased fifty thousand pounds per annum, beside the profit of a new dish introduced to the tables of all gentlemen of fortune in the kingdom who have any refinement in taste. And the money will circulate among ourselves, the goods being entirely of our own growth and manufacture.


Fourthly, The constant breeders, beside the gain of eight shillings sterling per annum by the sale of their children, will be rid of the charge of maintaining them after the first year.


Fifthly, This food would likewise bring great custom to taverns; where the vintners will certainly be so prudent as to procure the best receipts for dressing it to perfection, and consequently have their houses frequented by all the fine gentlemen, who justly value themselves upon their knowledge in good eating: and a skilful cook, who understands how to oblige his guests, will contrive to make it as expensive as they please.


Sixthly, This would be a great inducement to marriage, which all wise nations have either encouraged by rewards or enforced by laws and penalties. It would increase the care and tenderness of mothers toward their children, when they were sure of a settlement for life to the poor babes, provided in some sort by the public, to their annual profit instead of expense. We should see an honest emulation among the married women, which of them could bring the fattest child to the market. Men would become as fond of their wives during the time of their pregnancy as they are now of their mares in foal, their cows in calf, their sows when they are ready to farrow; nor offer to beat or kick them (as is too frequent a practice) for fear of a miscarriage.


Many other advantages might be enumerated. For instance, the addition of some thousand carcasses in our exportation of barreled beef, the propagation of swine's flesh, and improvement in the art of making good bacon, so much wanted among us by the great destruction of pigs, too frequent at our tables; which are no way comparable in taste or magnificence to a well-grown, fat, yearling child, which roasted whole will make a considerable figure at a lord mayor's feast or any other public entertainment. But this and many others I omit, being studious of brevity.


Supposing that one thousand families in this city, would be constant customers for infants flesh, besides others who might have it at merry meetings, particularly at weddings and christenings, I compute that Dublin would take off annually about twenty thousand carcasses; and the rest of the kingdom (where probably they will be sold somewhat cheaper) the remaining eighty thousand.


I can think of no one objection, that will possibly be raised against this proposal, unless it should be urged, that the number of people will be thereby much lessened in the kingdom. This I freely own, and 'twas indeed one principal design in offering it to the world. I desire the reader will observe, that I calculate my remedy for this one individual Kingdom of Ireland, and for no other that ever was, is, or, I think, ever can be upon Earth. Therefore let no man talk to me of other expedients: Of taxing our absentees at five shillings a pound: Of using neither cloaths, nor houshold furniture, except what is of our own growth and manufacture: Of utterly rejecting the materials and instruments that promote foreign luxury: Of curing the expensiveness of pride, vanity, idleness, and gaming in our women: Of introducing a vein of parsimony, prudence and temperance: Of learning to love our country, wherein we differ even from Laplanders, and the inhabitants of Topinamboo: Of quitting our animosities and factions, nor acting any longer like the Jews, who were murdering one another at the very moment their city was taken: Of being a little cautious not to sell our country and consciences for nothing: Of teaching landlords to have at least one degree of mercy towards their tenants. Lastly, of putting a spirit of honesty, industry, and skill into our shop-keepers, who, if a resolution could now be taken to buy only our native goods, would immediately unite to cheat and exact upon us in the price, the measure, and the goodness, nor could ever yet be brought to make one fair proposal of just dealing, though often and earnestly invited to it.


Therefore I repeat, let no man talk to me of these and the like expedients, 'till he hath at least some glympse of hope, that there will ever be some hearty and sincere attempt to put them into practice.


But, as to my self, having been wearied out for many years with offering vain, idle, visionary thoughts, and at length utterly despairing of success, I fortunately fell upon this proposal, which, as it is wholly new, so it hath something solid and real, of no expence and little trouble, full in our own power, and whereby we can incur no danger in disobliging England. For this kind of commodity will not bear exportation, and flesh being of too tender a consistence, to admit a long continuance in salt, although perhaps I could name a country, which would be glad to eat up our whole nation without it.


After all, I am not so violently bent upon my own opinion as to reject any offer proposed by wise men, which shall be found equally innocent, cheap, easy, and effectual. But before something of that kind shall be advanced in contradiction to my scheme, and offering a better, I desire the author or authors will be pleased maturely to consider two points. First, as things now stand, how they will be able to find food and raiment for an hundred thousand useless mouths and backs. And secondly, there being a round million of creatures in human figure throughout this kingdom, whose whole subsistence put into a common stock would leave them in debt two millions of pounds sterling, adding those who are beggars by profession to the bulk of farmers, cottagers, and laborers, with their wives and children who are beggars in effect: I desire those politicians who dislike my overture, and may perhaps be so bold as to attempt an answer, that they will first ask the parents of these mortals, whether they would not at this day think it a great happiness to have been sold for food, at a year old in the manner I prescribe, and thereby have avoided such a perpetual scene of misfortunes as they have since gone through by the oppression of landlords, the impossibility of paying rent without money or trade, the want of common sustenance, with neither house nor clothes to cover them from the inclemencies of the weather, and the most inevitable prospect of entailing the like or greater miseries upon their breed for ever.


I profess, in the sincerity of my heart, that I have not the least personal interest in endeavoring to promote this necessary work, having no other motive than the public good of my country, by advancing our trade, providing for infants, relieving the poor, and giving some pleasure to the rich. I have no children by which I can propose to get a single penny; the youngest being nine years old, and my wife past child-bearing.


---J. Swift.



------- ------- ------- ------
FARANTWURDUNG:

Applying the lessons we can draw from Mr. Swift's essay is supported by no less an authority than our Secretary of the Ulterior, Dov Bear. See here:http://dovbear.blogspot.com/2006/05/my-modest-proposal.html


Additional note: A well-known conservative apikoris cautions that the Mexican food generated by this proposal would not be kosher, and wouldn't even meet the minimal requirements of "biblical kashrus" popular with many Reform Jews.

Grahda, kalvechomer the stringent kashrus qualifications to which the orthodoxim adhere!
But note that there are only about six million Jews in the United States, whereas there are over two hundred and eighty million hungry Gentiles, most of whom are none to picky. So the issue is not one of kashrus, but rather of supply and demand.
Even with Jews (and possibly Muslims and Pentacostals) abstaining, there will NOT be enough to supply the market.

Without some limitations on our consumption, we may end up with the same vexing problem as we have with oil, namely a diminishing supply and rising prices - which would be disastrous!

Write your congressman, and press for regulation.




Comments are of course welcome. I would appreciate your thoughts.

Wednesday, May 03, 2006

DOS FINFTE... UND DOS VIERTE...

The Fifth of May always feels strange here in the US. I cannot quite get used to the idea of cinco de mayo, seeing as it falls on a date held poignant in the Netherlands.
Yom heruteinu, as Henri Kater used to call it.
Or the day that we were finally rid of those shitbag Germans, as my auntie used to say.


So, a propos thereto, a meise.

May Fourth, as the day preceding liberation day, is the Dutch memorial day. Every year thousands of people gather on Dam Square (and at many other places ) to remember those Netherlanders who did not live to see freedom again.
Wreaths are laid, speeches made, and two minutes of silence is observed.


One year on Dam Square, on May Fourth, a German tourist passes by, doesn't know what is going on, and taps one of the people at the event on the shoulder. "Ei, vass iss heppenink here? Vatt are yu doingg?"

The Amsterdammer patiently explains "sha, we are remembering the immense suffering that our nation experienced at the hands of the Germans during the war".

The German is miffed. "Vell, ve Tchermans suffered a lot during ze var also, you know".

And the Amsterdammer patiently explains "ja, we know. We're celebrating that tomorrow."



--- --- --- --- --- ---

Three or four years ago the memorial ceremonies were disturbed by young Maghrebis (of which the Netherlands has very many), who trashed the wreaths, heckled the participants, and gave every evidence of disrespecting the occasion.


This was probably an expression of both anti-Semitism and pro-Palestinianism.
As well as a rude gesture towards Dutch society, of a style which unthinkingly demonstrated that the Maghrebis had absorbed overmuch of Dutch manners, morals, and thoughtlessness. Ironically, by being so utterly un-Dutch they showed how typically Dutch they had become.

But for whatever reason, it ticked off the Dutch. For weeks afterwards the press flowed over with outrage and venom directed at the Maghrebis.


Why exactly were the autochthonous peeved, and why precisely did the allochthonous do what they did?


The autochthonous people (natives) were angry because, of course, the Maghrebis (aka allochthonous, ergo 'immigrants') had disrespected the quarter of a million Dutch who had perished in World War II.

The Dutch-Maghrebi teenagers, on the other hand, saw it as an event with a Jewish focus.
And therein lies the problem.

Of the Dutchmen who perished in WWII, over forty percent were Jewish - nearly three quarters of the Dutch Jewish population did not survive the war. So WWII memorial events naturally tend to stress what happened to the Jews (who may, because of above mentioned events, be notable by their absence).

That the Netherlands is pro-Israel (or perceived as such) is a sore point for many of the Dutch-Maghrebis. Most Dutch will assume that this is because the Maghrebis cannot but be unfairly biased in favour of fellow Arabs. The Dutch-Maghrebis on the other hand, with equal validity, claim that the Dutch are unjustifiably anti-Arab and pro-Jewish.

The Dutch-Maghrebis are right.

The Dutch anti-Arab bias is not based primarily on the situation in the Middle-East, but on the fact that Maghrebis and other Arabs are the 'other', the foreign element, the outsiders, and (historically) the despoilers of Christian countries and slavers of the Mediterranean.

The Dutch pro-Jewish bias is not based primarily on Israel (much though many Dutch admire the Jewish state), but on the fact that for many, Jews WERE Dutch, and ARE dead.
[And the dead are ALL Dutch, you know. Often more Dutch than the living.]


This is a generalization, of course.

There are many other factors in play, such as the perception of shared history and shared values, admiration for a plucky small country that repulsed its enemies and survived against horrific odds, the shared characteristics of stubbornness, brashness, chutzpah, the similarity of the wars of national survival (the Dutch eighty year war against Spain, during which time the rest of Europe either ignored the situation or actively collaborated with the Spanish, which compares with the Israeli resistence to the Paynim while the world apathetizes), and last but not least massive guilt over what had become of Dutch Jewry.


Insofar as the resident Maghrebis understand the significance of what happened to Dutch Jewry, what it means to them is that the Dutch are venerating the memory of a minority that they allowed to be slaughtered, while despising the minority that is there now.


One could argue that if the Dutch want the resident aliens to share their veneration of the Dutch past, they would do well to include them in the Dutch present, rather than sending a message of their eventual fate.

Tuesday, May 02, 2006

ANTHEM-THINGY, SHMANTHEM-THINGY!!!

Okay, so the bigot.., sorry, I mean 'patriotic Republicans and all right-thinking people' don't like the idea of a Spanish version of the national anthem.

I'm not too hep on it myself.

Reason being that I don't speak Spanish (not that there's anything wrong with that).

So I'll probably sing it in Yiddish.


Star spengld bener
fun Frensis Skat Ki

O zog! konstu zen in likht fun sof nakht,
Vos mir hobn bagrist in demer-shayn mit freyd?
Di shtrayfn, di shtern -- in flaker fun shlakht
Fun di shuts-vent mir hobn mit bang in blik bagleyt.

Un der blits fun raket, un der knal fun kanon
Durkh der nakht gerufn hobn zey: es lebt di fon.
O zog! di fon mit di shtern iz zi nokh tsehelt
Iber land fun fraye un iber heym fun held?

Afn breg, durkh neplen fun yam fartunklt,
Vu dem soynes makhne iz fartayet in shrek,
Vos iz es, in bloz fun laykhtn vintl fartunken,
Ot halb-farborgn, ot af a helft antplekt?
Es iz di fon mit di shtern, o, af lang zey tsehelt
Iber land fun fraye un der heym fun held.

O, azoy vet es tomed zayn, ven frayer mentsh mit gever in hant
Bashitsn vet zayn libe heym kegn farlend fun krig un zayn shnit!
Gebentsht mit zig un frid, zol dos land
Loybn di kraft, vos hot undz als folk farhit!

Undzer kamf iz a gerekhter -- undzer iz der nitsokhn,
Zol zayn undzer gebot: "In got iz undzer bitokhn!"
Un di fon mit di shtern, in zig vet zi zayn tsehelt
Iber land fun fraye un der heym fun held!


--- - --- - --- - --- - ---


This blog gratefully acknowledges 'Conservative Apikoris', one of the regular commenters on Dovbear's site (http://dovbear.blogspot.com/ ), who appended the Yiddish version underneath this post (http://dovbear.blogspot.com/2006/05/star-spangled-banner-should-only-be.html ), from the comment thread of which I lifted it.

A fine blog. With many fine commenters.

I do not know if Conservative Apikoris has a blog.
If not, he should.

He got it from here:
http://shakti.trincoll.edu/~mendele/vol06/vol06.279

An intro to Mendele is here: http://www.ibiblio.org/yiddish/mendele.html

A fine site for Yiddishisten.

PRAMOEDYA ANANTA TOER, 1925 - 2006

Pramoedya Ananta Toer has passed away at age 81.

Probably the most important Indonesian writer of the 20th century, his oeuvre spanned the last years of Dutch colonial rule and the first generations of independence.


Much of his life was spent in custody, starting in 1947 when the Dutch imprisoned him for two years because of his role in the independence struggle. He was released in 1949.

After an scathing indictment of the Soekarno regime's treatment of the Chinese minority he was imprisoned again ten years later, spending a year in the slammer.

Following the alleged Communist coup in 1965 (almost certainly engineered by Suharto and the CIA to provide a pretext for the extermination of the Communists), he was sent into internal exile on the Island of Buru, a penal colony first employed by the Dutch to warehouse nationalists in the twenties and thirties.

Ironically, this period was to be one of his most productive; while confined, he wrote the Buru Quartet, which was published volume by volume after his release to house arrest in 1979, and, predictably, banned volume by volume shortly thereafter.


House arrest was finally lifted in 1992.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/4959488.stm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pramoedya_Ananta_Toer

Article from the NRC Handelsblad (in Dutch):
http://www.nrc.nl/kunst/article300365.ece


A list of his works is shown below. Please note that they are listed by their titles in Dutch (I believe most of them have also been translated into English).

De vluchteling (Publ. 1950)
Guerrillafamilie (Publ. 1950)
Een koude kermis (Publ. 1951)
In de fuik (Publ. 1951)
Wat verdwenen is: verhalen uit Blora (Publ. 1952)
Corruptie (Publ. 1954)
Midah, het liefje met de Gouden tand (Publ. 1955)
De stroom uit het Noorden (Publ. 1979)
Aarde der mensen (Publ. 1980)
Kind van alle volken (Publ. 1980)
Voetsporen (Publ. 1985)
Meisje van het strand (Publ. 1985)
Het glazen huis Publ. 1988)
Lied van een stomme. Gevangene op Buru (Publ. 1989)
Lied van een stomme: Brieven van Buru (Publ. 1991)
De onheilskomeet (Publ. 1998)
Arok (Publ. 2001)
Verhalen van Djakarta (Publ. 2002)

Monday, May 01, 2006

NATIONAL ANTHEM, EN ESPANYOL

I guess it was insanely optimistic to plan for a burrito today.

The taqueria were I usually go had a sign in the window apologizing for the inconvenience.

Why did I think they would be open?

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---

Anyhow, the anthem.

Apparently many radio commentators and opinionists have bloviated outrage over the translation of our national anthem into Spanish.

Y'all might want to chill out, you poxy cretins.

Spanish has been spoken on this continent quite as long as English, and is just as American. Look at the map before you disagree. Our place-names, for large parts of the country, are in Spanish. I live in San Francisco, not Saint Francis town. The capitol of my state is Sacramento, not 'The Sacraments'. Those majestic mountains are the Sierras, not the 'Saws'.

And as a Dutch-speaking descendant of Dutchmen who were in New Amsterdam before the English seized the place, I am not particularly pleased with you lot. We were doing fine exploiting the natives, shooting up the local wildlife, and picking quarrels with the French further up the coast untill y'all stuck your big Anglo-Saxon noses into our affairs.

I guess I'll have to tolerate you - Lord knows I have no choice. You're here, and there are far too many of you to reverse the trend.

However, if you insist that the national anthem only be sung in English, I expect you'll have no objection to reading the Bible in Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek (I'm including that weird crap you insist on calling the new testament in the definition 'Bible').


If the subtle meaning of the anthem is lost by translation, how much more so the import of scripture?

If any of the noble sentiments are lessened by translation, then that much more for sacred writing.

If any sense of group identity is offended by a translated song, surely it is heresy to even consider reading holy writ in anything other than the original sacred languages.


Well, what about it?

For a nominal fee, I am willing to teach some of you how to read it in Hebrew.

I even promise that I'll stay at least one chapter ahead of you in the textbook (my Hebrew is not that good, but it is far, far better than most of you lot can manage).

For Aramaic and Greek, you are entirely on you own, though.


And count your lucky stars - you won't need to learn Dutch. Despite our having been here longer than most of you, we'd rather not have you butchering our language. We've seen what you did to English.

Thursday, April 27, 2006

FOR CRAPS SAKE!

Dovbear has a posting which is very interesting (link here: http://dovbear.blogspot.com/2006/04/new-threat.html).

I reproduce the entire post below:

Matthias Goering, a grand-nephew of the notorious Nazi, is continuing his ancestor's work. Under the cover of conversion to Judaism, the young Goering is actively working to recruit Jews to Christianity.

And he is not alone.

We tear our shirts over the high assimilationist rates in this country. The American holocaust it's called. And, the knee-jerk reaction is to blame it all on the forces of secularism. There's some truth to that, I suppose, but secularism doesn't pursue converts. Unlike the Christians, secularism doesn't have a plan. It merely creates an environment where planning is possible. For all the breast-beating about secularism, not nearly enough is said about people who organize concerted efforts to convert Jews. Instead of fingering the real threat, we blame secularism, and speak carelessly and incorrectly about how those Christians who scheme for our souls are "true and reliable friends."


------ - - - ------ - - - ------

So far Dovbear. Now onward.

Regarding Matthias Goering, I have lifted an entire passage from the website to which Dov provided the clickable link (http://www.tikkunministries.org/newsletters/RI-news-feb06.htm):

"Last week we were blessed to have a visit by Matthias Goering. He came to faith in Yeshua 5 years ago. Soon afterward God began to speak to him about Israel and the Jewish people. In a vision God called him to be a watchman on the walls of Jerusalem. Matthias told God, "This cannot be. You know my last name. You have the wrong man." But God told him, "I have chosen you to be a bridge between me and my people." Matthias has visited Israel several times since then, and he feels at home here. This in itself is amazing, because since his early childhood he was raised to hate Jewish people. Matthias is the great nephew of Herman Goering the number 2 leader in Hitler's government, and commander of his Luftwaffe forces (air force). "

Blogeditorial comment: I must confess that I think it the height of arrogance and egomania to assume that the voice inside your head is the Almighty. Is it not much more reasonable to check yourself into a clinic, or have a praescription written, or get help?

Still, while this shows an upsetting Messianic (or at least "chosen") tendency for Matthias, I suppose it IS less harmful than running for President of the United States, or ordering followers to pote cyanide-laced kool-aid. Perhaps. The point is debatable.


Further:
"Matthias is a physiotherapist. One of his clients is also one of our most devoted Swiss volunteers. When this sister discovered that Matthias was a believer and a lover of Israel she introduced Matthias to Asher. This relationship is indicative of the ministry of reconciliation between German Christians and many Israeli Messianic groups including Revive Israel. Matthias thought his calling was too heavy, but God called him to simply obey and show up at the places where Israelis are. He has been stunned at the potential for reconciliation with Israelis. However there is a catch; many Israeli's say, "We won't forget and we won't forgive." This trap prevents many Israelis from receiving God's full forgiveness because they are not willing to fully forgive. "

Blogeditorial comment: Oh cheeses! More arrogance! And this time coupled with a tendency to bother strangers.

Plus a wonderful new twist on the classic accusation that the Jewish refusal to accept Christ is due to some perverse flaw on their part.

This new twist clicks onto the 'forgiveness receptor' in the subconscious of many Christians - forgiveness is one of those things that Christians claim especial credit for, and Shylock was not forgiving, was he?

The obscenity in this statement is the suggestion that Jews should forget and forgive, and that not doing so is what makes them damnable. It is doubly obscene because many Europeans blame Jewish vindictiveness over WWII for the ongoing tumult in the Middle East. It is triply obscene because it is a German making the statement.

As any European who can ignore his or her own apologesis and conceits should readily recognize.


--- - --- - --- - ---
I find the whole concept of trying to convert Jews to Christianity repulsive. Much more so than the proselytizing among the general (and therefore mostly Christian or ex-Christian) populace, although there is also something slimy about Jayzits-thumpers poaching from each-other's flock.

There is something stalkerish and opportunistic about missionaries.

Tikkun Ministries, the organization in which Matthias Goering is active, is of course a Messianic group. Most of such groups have de-stressed the term "Jews for Jezus" because of the distaste that term engenders - and perhaps because there are hardly any members of Jewish origin, and none who are actually Jewish.


The compulsion to convert Jews is based in the idea that Jewish refusal to accept Christian nonsense is somehow more depraved than the innocent scepticism of the heathen, and the self-serving conviction that these Jayzits-whacker latecomers to the salvation racket have a holy task given to them, and dammit those Jews should just stop being so contrary!


There is a lot more to it than that, of course, but most of it is quite as repellant, and more than mildly similar to a snotty child's absorption with his own penis.

It's all about them and their collective naughty bits.

I rather wish that the Goyim would not be so fascinated by the Jews, and stop obsessing about them. It leads to weird behaviour.

[Yes, yes, I know. But doesn't that actually totally prove what I just said?]


The Jews who get caught up in the nets these Jayzits-trolls fling out are often the ones who know Jack-diddly about Judaism and zip-diddly about Christianity (which explains why they fit right in with the sect's other dunces).

Of course, roping in the ignorant is a traditional part of the Christian missionary endeavor.

Which is probably why there are so many Christians.

The problem is that even after many centuries, many still know little, and many still act like starry-eyed converts.


I do not like converts.
Generally speaking.



--------------- --------------- ---------------

Lipman wrote the following comment underneath Dov's post:
"I can't see a continuity here. Much more so with the larger number of meshuggene Germans who've been converting (?) to Judaism since the 70s and are now hardline kill-the-Arabs settlers.


Must be great: You convert to the victims, and can still take up grandpa's traditions."


From a similar inability to distance myself from the Dutch, I have obsessively delved into Indonesian history and languages, and know far too much about Dutch colonial excesses. And headhunting, tribal cloth patterns, spicy food, etcetera.

But it is better to be on the outside looking in. Being too much inside sabotages perspective. A conversion might only make such myopia worse.

I did not know that there were that many German converts.

That there are is less surprising than disturbing.
It oddly echoes of the Christian belief that Christians are the new Israel.
Maybe it is also a denial of dysfunctionality, or an attempt to escape it.

Friday, April 21, 2006

EIGHTY DEGREES, LEATHER, AND TOO MANY JEWS!!!

Remember that post from the Godol Hador which I copy-pasted last week?
The one in which he was happily looking forward to eight days of food, rest, tea rooms, and a BIG BOWL OF JELLY FRUIT AND COCONUT MACAROONS?


[Here: http://atthebackofthehill.blogspot.com/2006/04/jelly-fruit-and-coconut-macaroons.html]

It was his last posting before leaving town for Peysach.
For over ten days he was away, and the bloggosphere was the quieter for it.

But, baruch Hashem, he's back. And he has written about his vacation.
[Here: http://godolhador.blogspot.com/#114564806810341219]

And he ain't happy!!!

------ ------ ------ ------ ------

This is his posting - it is an object lesson! Read it!






Friday, April 21, 2006

Pesach (Hotel) is BOGUS!
(Totally swamped at work after being away for a week, will have to write shorthand. )


15 minute walk from our room to the dining hall!!! And we only brought along the cheapo Target travel strollers, and not our mega expensive, all terrain Bugaboo Baby Urban Jogger thingy. Also I forgot my shoes and had to spend Yom Tov wearing a pair of $12.99 Wal Mart plastic specials. No fair! Why didn’t you tell us this bit of important info in the brochure???? You call yourself Pesach Tours? You should rename yourself to Pesach Walking Tours I think. Jeez. A 15 minute hike to the dining room in 80 degree heat with 2 crappy strollers and a pair of Wal-Mart shoes is not my idea of a luxury vacation.


Also way too many Jews, especially Jews from Brooklyn (not that there’s anything wrong with that). Luckily they were mostly MO Jews. But still! Who wants to be around Jews on vacation?


Also, why was I the only sruggy in shul? Don’t MO Jews wear sruggies anymore? What’s with all the black leather kippot? Is this a religious statement, that they’re too frum for sruggies? (But not too frum to spend yom tov afternoon ‘by’ the pool). Or is it just a fashion statement, i.e. my Lexus is leather, my sofa is leather, my ipod case is leather, so my kippa should be leather too?!


Also, what’s with all these Artscroll Hagadas: Hagadah of the Baalei Mussar, Haggadah of the Roshei Yeshivos? My theory is that the secret nobody wants to admit to is that Seder is BORING for anyone over 12 years old, so they keep coming out with new Hagados to keep it fresh. What next?


Coming soon from Artscroll: The Hagadah of the Gedolei HaKanoim – due for release Pesach 2007

Contributors: Rabbi Leib Pinter – due for release Pesach 2025 (ba-da-boom!)


Also, if you’re gonna advertise a ‘Grand Finale Pesach Dinner’ for the last afternoon of Yom Tov, don’t go and serve some freakin pareve crap and a plate of cheese, unless you want to get trashed all over the blogosphere, you Pesach hotel dummies!!!! Sheesh.

And your Tea Room SUCKED. Way too much Junk Food. And don’t go telling me that I can’t get into the Dining Hall at 10:20am to feed my kids breakfast cos you need to setup for fleishig lunch (and then lunch turns out to be milchiks anyway) and that I should feed my kids in the Team Room instead. Who feeds their kids coconut macaroons and jelly fruit for breakfast???? Are you nuts????!!!!!!

Needless to say we shall not be attending your bogus Pesach Hotel program next year.
[The GH divinely posted this at 3:33 PM today.]


------ ------ ------ ------ ------

One of the best godolhadoric rants ever. And all of that written on his first day at the office, between getting back to the city and heading home for shabbes. Truly, he is one of the gedolei ha dor.


And you should read him. More than you do.
Click here: http://godolhador.blogspot.com/


On a personal note, I hope that next Peysach more than makes up for the heartache of this Peysach.

On a blogger note, I hope otherwise - this is some seriously good stuff!

I'm conflicted; talk among yourselves.

------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Other fine gedolic posts which you really should read:
http://godolhador.blogspot.com/2005/03/weird-wacky-theory.html

http://godolhador.blogspot.com/2005/08/skeptical-of-selective-skepticism.html

http://godolhador.blogspot.com/2005/08/mis-nagid-is-mechazek-emunah.html

http://godolhador.blogspot.com/2005/07/zohar-kabala-ari-i-told-you-so.html

http://godolhador.blogspot.com/2005/04/chareidi-ideology-science-bad-pagan.html

There are many others. Embark on your own voyage of discovery. And let him know you visited.



MALE AND FEMALE PARTY MEMBERS HE CREATED THEM

In a refreshing sign of modernity, women may soon be allowed to become members of the 'Governmental Reformed Party' (Staatkundig Gereformeerde Partij) in the Netherlands.


But they will NOT be permitted to run for office.


This according to the party leadership, as detailed in the party report 'Male And Female He Created Them' (Man en vrouw schiep Hij hen), published today.

I expect that in typical Dutch fashion, if this proposal is approved by a two thirds majority of the party, a number of dissidents will break away to form a new reformed political party.

Note: Reformed in this context means Dutch Reformed Church - of which there are more than forty two sects active in the Netherlands, including two major branches, and several smaller and more doctrinaire groups. To the outsider one of the major disputes between the groups appears to be whether they are 'hervormd' (reformed) or 'gereformeerd' (reformed). There are other differences, such as which nusach they sing - in Ederveen the nusach of Petrus Datheen is used exclusively, elsewhere there have been concessions to modern Dutch in that regard, but the old Staten Bijbel translation is still widely used.

Some 'reformed' towns are monolithic and 'streng' - Staphorst and Opheusden come to mind. Think in terms of Mea Shearim (and don't even think of driving through on the Sabbath - your car will be stoned). Many communities preserve the sermons and writings of their preachers as part of their particular tradition, respecting these as being just one or two steps removed from the sanctity of actual scripture.

The Dutch Reformed are Calvinist, schismatic, given to rigid judgementalism, and a firm belief in predestination - which means that if you aren't one of them, they aren't really interested in what you do or think. Just don't do it in public and upset the horses, okay?!!


The decision to put this proposal up for vote is described as 'courageous' and 'daring'.

If you read Dutch, you may find the NRC article here: http://www.nrc.nl/binnenland/article290104.ece


Huzza. There's no stopping modernity.


--- --- --- --- ---

APPENDIX I.
Communities that still use the Datheen nusach:

1. Reformed Community in the Netherlands (Gereformeerde Gemeente in Nederland):
Arnemuiden
Bruinisse
Goes
Kruiningen
Middelburg
St. Annaland
St. Maartensdijk
Terneuzen
Zierikzee

2. Reformed Community in the Netherlands - Non Union (Gereformeerde Gemeente in Nederland - Buiten verband):
Middelburg
Nieuwerkerk

3. Reformed Community (Gereformeerde Gemeente):
St. Annaland
Scherpenisse
Kruiningen
Borssele

4. Old Reformed Community (Oud Gereformeerde Gemeente)
Achterberg
Amersfoort
Ederveen
Elst
Geldermalsen
's-Gravenpolder
's-Gravendeel
Oostburg
Oosterland
Rhenen
St. Maartensdijjk
St. Philipsland
Stavenisse
Terneuzen
Waddinxveen
Zierikzee


APPENDIX II.
Petrus Datheen (1531-1588).
[Pronunciation: Pay-tress Dat-hain.]

Peter Datheen was born in 1531 or 1532 in Cassel (Flanders). As an adult, after a number of years as a member of the Catholic clergy he become a Protestant, and in consequence had to flee the Spanish Netherlands, along with many others. It will be remembered that king Philip of Spain was determined to eradicate heresy from his domains and to that end had sent the Duke of Alva (yemach shemo!) to his northern inheritance with orders to use all means at his disposal, even the extermination of whole populations, toward that goal. Exact numbers of the victims are not known, but a conservative estimate of the numbers of natives executed for heresy by the Spaniards runs well over a hundred thousand, and estimates of nearly half a million are not at all rare (bear in mind that the total population of the Netherlands, north and south, at that time was around three million).

When the north had been liberated, Peter Datheen and a number of others who were to be instrumental in the building of the Dutch reformed church finally returned to the Netherlands. At the same time, refugees from southern provinces still held by the Spanish flocked north to the cities of Holland and Utrecht - many of the great literati and artists of the Golden Age were of Flemish and Brabantine refugee stock.

[On a personal note, it was during that same period that my ancestor Pieter Janszoon van Deursen (b. 1575 in Brabant) fled to the north, ending up in Haarlem, where his son Abraham Pieterszoon van Deursen was born in 1607. Abraham Pieterszoon emigrated to Nieuw Amsterdam - his son Isaac Abrahamszoon was born in 1635 at Kings. Isaac Abrahamszoon van Deursen, adhering to the typically Dutch naming conventions of the time (names of fathers and sons alternating), subsequently named his son Abraham after his grandfather.]


The war against Spain would continue untill 1648 (treaty of Westphalia), but the Dutch had so succeeded in debilitating the Spanish during eighty years of fighting that the Dutch East India Company (V.O.C.) became for nearly a century the worlds naval superpower and regularly blew the Iberians out of the water. We're still kvelling about that, in mittn drinnen.

Peter Datheen is most known for his writings on Church structure and practise, especially his eloquent liturgy - a liturgy which, as has been mentioned above, is still used by a number of communities. His translations of the Psalms are extraordinarily beautiful Dutch, but are archaic and impenetrable to many modern eyes. They have been replaced by transparent, and unexciting, modern verses.

That replacing of older liturgical material, coupled with the many wicked innovations which reformist branches of the reformed church have slammed through, has led to many current Dutch reformed church members being neither reformed nor reformed.

[Not that that makes ever-so-what difference to me - my ancestors got the heck out of Brabant, got the heck out of Holland, and then got the heck out of the Dutch Reformed church, and out of organized religion entirely. Think of it as a family tradition of wanderlust. We've even wanderlustily miscegenated with Anglo-Saxons, Scots, and others since then.]


The only work of Petrus Datheen which is still in print was first published on June 24, 1584, six years after the synod of Dordrecht, thirteen years after the synod of Emden (the first synod of the rebel faith).

It bears the somewhat cumbersome title "Een Christelijke samenspreking uit Gods Woord, tot troost van alle bekommerde harten, die de Wet en het Evangelie niet recht kunnen onderscheiden; en die zich met de last der zonden en met de vreze voor de verdoemenis bezwaard vinden" ('A Christian discourse over G-d's word, to the comfort of all troubled hearts that cannot rightly differentiate between the Law and the Evangelion, and who find themselves contested by the burden of sins and the fear of damnation').

THE SMUT POLICE

Interesting article in 'Joods Nederland' today (Dutch Language original posted under the English encapsulation).
[Joods Nederland is here: http://www.joods.nl/]


Pius hackers battle porn on the internet.

So far only Israeli porno sites have been attacked, but the hackers plan to combat all porno-sites worldwide. On one porno-site all content was removed, on others the depictions of congress had been replaced with a photo of the Rebbe.

Underneath the photo is the caption "We, the Da-Net group, have hacked into this site and erased all its abomination", followed by a tirade against pornography, which, according to the hackers, has caused the death of countless people, great misery, and horrible disasters.

["Tot dusver zijn alleen Israëlische pornosites aangevallen, maar de hackers hebben het gemunt op alle pornosites wereldwijd. Op één website was de complete content weggehaald, op een aantal andere was op de plek waar eerst sex-afbeeldingen te zien waren, een foto van de Rebbe geplaatst.
Onder de foto staat de tekst "We, the Da-Net group, have hacked into this site and erased all its abomination" ("Wij de Da-Net groep, hebben ingebroken op deze website en alle verwerpelijke inhoud gewist."). De tekst wordt gevolgd door een tirade tegen pornografie die volgens de vrome hackers al 'talloze mensen de dood in heeft gejaagd en de oorzaak is van onafzienbare ellende en grote rampen.' "]


Article here: http://www.joods.nl/content/view/40511/43/


What to say of this?

Clearly it is a good thing!

It will force countless people to obtain their smut the old-fashioned way, thus benefitting small businessmen and convenience stores everywhere. Some people may reconsider their addiction, and devote themselves to good works instead. Money will be spent locally! Jobs will be created! Trailer parks will hear the happy noise of families finally interacting again!
And Apu Nahasapinapatelam might even be able to hire someone for the store - he desperately needs a vacation.


Disclaimer: I do not purchase pornography, nor view it on the internet; my imagination is good enough, and I have no trouble in my minds eye feeling the warm velvety skin of........


--- --- --- --- ---

Afterthought: What do you suppose the reaction of the typical pervert will be when she cruises into her favourite porn-site and discovers the visage of the Rebbe instead?

This is really where, when, and how these Lubavitchers want people to first discover the Rebbe?

Nu, at least it's not Madonna.

Thursday, April 20, 2006

THE DUTCH WWII MYTH

The Netherlands has for nearly sixty years maintained that during World War Two the general population, and officials who stayed at their posts during the German occupation, knew nothing of what awaited deported Jews.

That is the key axiom of the Dutch World War II Myth.

[There are a few other axioms: "the non-Jewish Dutch tried to protect their Jewish fellow citizens", "they guarded Jewish property in hopes that the Jews would return after the war", "many gentiles hid Jews or helped them escape", "resistance was futile", "many people joined the resistance", and "many Dutch gentiles also suffered during the occupation".]


Well, no offense, but bla bla bla.
[Bla bla, bla bla, bla bla bla bla bla bla bla....bla!]



A book published today, Tegen Beter Weten In (Against Better Judgement, by Ies Vuijsje), claims somewhat otherwise.
Regarding the myth of ignorance, that is.


According to the author, both Jews and non-Jews in the Netherlands knew what was happening fairly early on. Yes, those who weren't paying attention, and those with their heads in the sand, were not as cognizant as the others, but the government in exile, the "resistance", the officials and bureaucrats who efficiently kept the occupation running smoothly for the Germans, much of the passive mass, and Jewish citizens themselves knew what the Germans were up to.


The article in the Volkskrant about the book is here:
http://www.volkskrant.nl/binnenland/article288127.ece/Geschiedschrijving_over_jodenvervolging_vervalst


The NRC Handelsblad article is here:
http://www.nrc.nl/binnenland/article288806.ece


The Volkskrant quotes Professor Ivo Schöffer (Leiden University, history dept., retired) as saying that the book should permanently put to rest the myth of popular and bureaucratic ignorance of the fate of the Dutch Jews at the time. And he also bases that in part on personal experience during 1942: "De Jong en zijn medewerkers waren destijds van mening dat dat wetenschap achteraf moest zijn geweest. Maar ik weet zeker dat ik toen een joodse vrouw heb gewaarschuwd voor deportatie: u weet welk vreselijk lot u wacht." ('De Jong and his colleagues in those days opined that that knowledge was hindsight. But I know that I warned a Jewish woman then about deportation: 'you know the horrible fate that awaits you'').


The author, Ies Vuisje, writes that Dutch post-war historians, most especially Loe De Jong, conformed to the myth that no one knew what was happening. This despite the underground press during 1942 having gone into explicit detail over the Endlösung der Judenfrage decided upon earlier in the year.


The NRC Handelsblad, which is the mouthpiece of establishment Dutchdom, takes a different approach to the book - somewhat critical, and quoting David Barnouw (head of NIOD - the Netherlands Institute for War (oorlog) Documentation) as stating that Vuisje was a sloppy researcher.

Especially Vuisje's conclusion that De Jong cherrypicked among documents and sources to substantiate his own views and omitted the facts draw David Barnouw's ire: "Die bewering van Vuijsje is, met permissie, een leugen. In een passage van ongeveer 40 pagina’s behandelt De Jong de problematiek van wat men in Nederland wist van het lot van de joden. Daarbij citeert hij letterlijk passages uit illegale kranten waarin termen als ‘volledig uitgemoord’ en ‘koelbloedig vergast’ voorkomen." ('That claim of Vuisje's is, by your leave, a lie. In one passage of approximately forty pages, De Jong deals with the issue of what was known in the Netherlands of the fate of the Jews. There he quotes literally passages from the underground newspapers in which terms such as 'completely exterminated' and 'cold-bloodedly gassed' are used').


[Bloggeditorial comment: So in any case the underground press knew, and as more people in the Netherlands were members of the resistance and involved in the distribution of underground newspapers than in any other occupied country (as has been vociferated ad nauseum!), it may be assumed that everybody knew.
Let me simplify that: Everybody knew. Everybody knew. Everybody knew.]


As further substantiation of his assertion that such knowledge was not widespread, Barnouw mentions the following: "Een groep studenten heeft bij ons onderzoek gedaan naar oorlogsdagboeken van Amsterdammers. Daaruit bleek dat sommigen eerder op de hoogte waren van wat er met de joden gebeurde, anderen later, of niet." ('A group of our students researched war-diaries of Amsterdammers. From which it became obvious that some were cognizant at an earlier stage of what was happening to the Jews, others later or not at all.').


[Bloggeditorial comment: And people living in a brutal police state always write the unalloyed truth in their diaries? No one need fear that their private documents will be used against them, or that collaborators and informants might translate one's scribbles?
The only thing that those diaries establish is that some people did not write about everything - people use diaries to record their own lives, and what moves, irritates, or impacts them, at the time. Even then not everything will be jotted down. Not everybody is as irritatingly puntje-precies as Samuel Pepys.]


Vuisje, however, remarks that the myth of Dutch final-solution ignorance was a post-war product: "Direct na de oorlog is de mythe ontstaan dat men van het lot van de joden niets geweten had. Kennelijk was de waarheid te pijnlijk om onder ogen te zien." ('Immediately after the war, the myth originated that no one knew of the fate of the Jews. Apparently the truth was too painful to admit').


[Bloggeditorial comment: Dutch speakers were very well represented among the foreigners serving in the eastern theatre. Granted, they were probably drawn from the most poor-stupid-ignorant segment of the population, but were they 'ignorant'? The idea that reports didn't filter back from the several tens of thousands of Dutchmen and Flemings wearing SS uniforms is simply not credible - precisely like the villagers next to the lagers claiming that they did not know anything. In any case, the role of the collaborators and the Dutch SS legions still needs to be made a matter of the public WWII awareness, rather than dismissed as an afterthought. Much myth remains. Large parts of the truth are still too painful to admit. Apparently.]

--- --- --- --- --- ---

Note that the Dutch view of World War Two and their own part in it has been under siege for some time now. Some of us have long doubted the self-congratulatory aspects of Dutch historiography.

It's nice to see De Jong being toppled from his pedestal.

Wednesday, April 19, 2006

SHORT HISTORY OF THE JEWS OF EINDHOVEN - PART THREE

Synagogue, school, society.



Finally, after the nonsense of residency for Jews in Eindhoven had toned down (*), the small community started thinking in terms of the typical markers of a Jewish presence: Synagogue, Mikvah, and Cheder.

(*) As detailed in part one:
http://atthebackofthehill.blogspot.com/2006/03/short-history-of-jews-of-eindhoven.html , and part two:
http://atthebackofthehill.blogspot.com/2006/03/short-history-of-jews-of-eindhoven_23.html


THE BUILDING
In 1781 Joseph Isaacq and Philip Lazar purchased a building called 'De Wind' (the wind) on the Kerk Straat (Church Street), for the 294 florins. Remember, the gaurantee of good behaviour that had been demanded of Jews wishing to settle in Endhoven had been 300 florins - from this one can guess how small the building was, and conversely how extortionate the guarantee payment.
[No one ever said we Dutch weren't good at finding ways to profit - and, in a like manner, the prosperity of the Golden Age was founded on colonialist robbery, the slave trade, and selling supplies to the Spanish at the same time as Holland was at war with Spain. Our ethics often take a backseat to our opportunism.]


There was one small problem with the purchase of the house, however. The Jewish community was not a recognized entity, and so could not collectively hold property. Wherefore the building was registered to the ownership of Mr. Isaacq and Mr. Lazar personally. Upon changes in the community, the house was repeatedly sold to the subsequent secretaries of the community, being held next by Salomon Levie and Michiel Schuur, who in their turn rolled it over to another set of penningmeesters.


MULTI-TASKER
In 1786 the house was remodelled, to better serve its intended purpose. By this time the kehal had hired a gentleman to serve as teacher, voorlezer (baal kria), and slachter (shochet), for which multi-tasking they paid a salary of 150 florins.
Not a munificent sum, but the candidate would also be entitled to what was called 'ordinaire profijten' (ordinary profits; the customary sums and gifts of his office). The gentleman they had hired in 1784 was Heijman Mosis (the 'Jewish Master' of Woensel, see Part One). Unfortunately the schepenen (city councillors) of Eindhoven had, in their wisdom and mercy, demanded that he agree to leave town permanently in the spring of 1786 - no reason for this decision has been recorded. To this end, and to avoid further trouble with the local bureaucracy, the kerkmeester ('church-master'; the acting chair of the community) Mr. Moses Salomon had promised that he would ensure the 'delogementing' and departure of Mr. Mosis. This was done with such punctiliousness that Mr. Mosis could not collect the last installment of the monies due him from his salary and from the ordinary profits. Consequently, when Mr. Mosis had resettled in Veenendaal (outside of North Brabant province entirely), he requested that the city administration of Eindhoven permit him to legally proceed against the Jewish community of Eindhoven without being charged the filing fees, pointing out that the entire adventure had left him in some difficulty.

His claims were directed in general at the entire community, and in particular towards Philip Lazar, Abraham Joseph, Mozes Salomon Levie, Joseph Isaacq, and Wolf Polak. The city administration inquired of these gentleman about the case, and were informed that, on the contrary, Mr. Heijman Mosis still owed the community - 39 shellingen (shillings) in rent! He should pay up! The city administration decided to butt out at this point (and how very unlike the Dutch that decision was!). The case was never taken to court.

LARGEST KEHILLA IN NORTH BRABANT
In 1808 (during the Napoleonic years, when the Netherlands had been made a monarchy under Louis Napoleon), the government in the Hague requested information regarding the size and commonly held property of all religious communities in the country. The Land-drost of Brabant (more or less a chief administrative officer) forwarded the query to the city governments, and they in turn queried the local parishes. Aaron David and Lazarus Israel provided data showing that there were one hundred and seven members of the Jewish community in Eindhoven, making it by far the largest kehilla in the province.


The community had started to outgrow its facilities, so, upon receiving a grant from 'der melech' (Louis Napoleon) in 1809, the old shul was torn down and a the building of a new one was begun, which was finished in 1810.


[TO BE CONTINUED]

SEFIRAT HA'OMER 2006

COUNTING THE OMER


There are two parts to this, namely the brocho and the actual statement of the counting.


1. Recite the brocho: Baruch atah Adonay Eloheinu, melech ha'olam asher kidshanu bemitzvotav vetzivanu al sefirat ha'omer.
[Blessed are you, Lord our God, sovereign of the world, who has sanctified us with your mitzvot and commanded us concerning the counting of the Omer.]

2. State the count:

13 April 2006; Thursday night: Hayom yom echad la-omer.
[Today is the first day of the Omer.]

14 April 2006; Friday night (Shabbes): Hayom shnay yamim la-omer.
[Today is two days of the Omer.]

15 April 2006; Saturday night: Hayom shloshah yamim la-omer.
[Today is three days of the Omer.]

16 April 2006; Sunday night: Hayom arba'ah yamim la-omer.
[Today is four days of the Omer.]

17 April 2006; Monday night: Hayom chamishah yamim la-omer.
[Today is five days of the Omer.]

18 April 2006; Tuesday night: Hayom shishah yamim la-omer.
[Today is six days of the Omer.]

19 April 2006; Wednesday night: Hayom shiv'ah yamim shehaym shavuah echad la-omer.
[Today is seven days which are one week of the Omer.]

20 April 2006; Thursday night: Hayom shmonah yamim shehaym shavuah echad veyom echad la-omer.
[Today is eight days which are one week and one day of the Omer.]

21 April 2006; Friday night (Shabbes): Hayom tish'ah yamim shehaym shavuah echad ushnay yamim la-omer.
[Today is nine days which are one week and two days of the Omer.]

22 April 2006; Saturday night: Hayom 'asarah yamim shehaym shavuah echad ushloshah yamim la-omer.
[Today is ten days which are one week and three days of the Omer.]

23 April 2006; Sunday night: Hayom ahad asar yom shehaym shavuah echad ve-arba'ah yamim la-omer.
[Today is eleven days which are one week and four days of the Omer.]

24 April 2006; Monday night: Hayom shnaym asar yom shehaym shavuah echad vechamishah yamim la-omer.
[Today is twelve days which are one week and five days of the Omer.]

25 April 2006; Tuesday night: Hayom shloshah asar yom shehaym shavuah echad veshishah yamim la-omer.
[Today is thirteen days which are one week and six days of the Omer.]

26 April 2006; Wednesday night: Hayom arba'ah asar yom shehaym shnay shavuot la-omer.
[Today is fourteen days which are two weeks of the Omer.]

27 April 2006; Thursday night: Hayom chamishah asar yom shehaym shnay shavuot veyom echad la-omer.
[Today is fifteen days which are two weeks and one day of the Omer.]

28 April 2006; Friday night (Shabbes): Hayom shishah asar yom shehaym shnay shavuot ushnay yamim la-omer.
[Today is sixteen days which are two weeks and two days of the Omer.]

29 April 2006; Saturday night: Hayom shiv'ah asar yom shehaym shnay shavuot ushloshah yamim la-omer.
[Today is seventeen days which are two weeks and three days of the Omer.]

30 April 2006; Sunday night: Hayom shmonah asar yom shehaym shnay shavuot ve-arba'ah yamim la-omer.
[Today is eighteen days which are two weeks and four days of the Omer.]

1 May 2006; monday night: Hayom tish'ah asar yom shehaym shnay shavuot vechamishah yamim la-omer.
[Today is nineteen days which are two weeks and five days of the Omer.]

2 May 2006; Tuesday night: Hayom 'esrim yom shehaym shnay shavuot veshishah yamim la-omer.
[Today is twenty days which are two weeks and six days of the Omer.]

3 May 2006; Wednesday night: Hayom echad v'esrim yom shehaym shloshah shavuot la-omer.
[Today is twenty-one days which are three weeks of the Omer.]

4 May 2006; Thursday night: Hayom shnayim v'esrim yom shehaym shloshah shavuot veyom echad la-omer.
[Today is twenty-two days which are three weeks and one day of the Omer.]

5 May 2006; Friday night (Shabbes): Hayom shloshah v'esrim yom shehaym shloshah shavuot ushnay yamim la-omer.
[Today is twenty-three days which are three weeks and two days of the Omer.]

6 May 2006; Saturday night: Hayom arba'ah v'esrim yom shehaym shloshah shavuot ushloshah yamim la-omer.
[Today is twenty-four days which are three weeks and three days of the Omer.]

7 May 2006; Sunday night: Hayom chamishah v'esrim yom shehaym shloshah shavuot ve-arba'ah yamim la-omer.
[Today is twenty-five days which are three weeks and four days of the Omer.]

8 May 2006; monday night: Hayom shishah v'esrim yom shehaym shloshah shavuot vechamishah yamim la-omer.
[Today is twenty-six days which are three weeks and five days of the Omer.]

9 May 2006; Tuesday night: Hayom shiv'ah v'esrim yom shehaym shloshah shavuot veshishah yamim la-omer.
[Today is twenty-seven days which are three weeks and six days of the Omer.]

10 May 2006; Wednesday night: Hayom shmonah v'esrim yom shehaym arba'ah shavuot la-omer.
[Today is twenty-eight days which are four weeks of the Omer.]

11 May 2006; Thursday night: Hayom tish'ah v'esrim yom shehaym arba'ah shavuot veyom echad la-omer.
[Today is twenty-nine days which are four weeks and one day of the Omer.]

12 May 2006; Friday night (Shabbes): Hayom shloshim yom shehaym arba'ah shavuot ushnay yamim la-omer.
[Today is thirty days which are four weeks and two days of the Omer.]

13 May 2006; Saturday night: Hayom echad ushloshim yom shehaym arba'ah shavuot ushloshah yamim la-omer.
[Today is thirty-one days which are four weeks and three days of the Omer.]

14 May 2006; Sunday night: Hayom shnayim ushloshim yom shehaym arba'ah shavuot ve-arba'ah yamim la-omer.
[Today is thirty-two days which are four weeks and four days of the Omer.]

15 May 2006; Monday night (Erev Lag B'Omer): Hayom shloshah ushloshim yom shehaym arba'ah shavuot vechamishah yamim la-omer.
[Today is thirty-three days which are four weeks and five days of the Omer.]

16 May 2006; Tuesday night: Hayom arba'ah ushloshim yom shehaym arba'ah shavuot veshishah yamim la-omer.
[Today is thirty-four days which are four weeks and six days of the Omer.]

17 May 2006; Wednesday night: Hayom chamishah ushloshim yom shehaym chamishah shavuot la-omer.
[Today is thirty-five days which are five weeks of the Omer.]

18 May 2006; Thursday night: Hayom shishah ushloshim yom shehaym chamishah shavuot veyom echad la-omer.
[Today is thirty-six days which are five weeks and one day of the Omer.]

19 May 2006; Friday night (Shabbes): Hayom shiv'ah ushloshim yom shehaym chamishah shavuot ushnay yamim la-omer.
[Today is thirty-seven days which are five weeks and two days of the Omer.]

20 May 2006; Saturday night: Hayom shmonah ushloshim yom shehaym chamishah shavuot ushloshah yamim la-omer.
[Today is thirty-eight days which are five weeks and three days of the Omer.]

21 May 2006; Sunday night: Hayom tish'ah ushloshim yom shehaym chamishah shavuot ve-arba'ah yamim la-omer.
[Today is thirty-nine days which are five weeks and four days of the Omer.]

22 May 2006; Monday night: Hayom arba'im yom shehaym chamishah shavuot vechamishah yamim la-omer.
[Today is forty days which are five weeks and five days of the Omer.]

23 May 2006; Tuesday night: Hayom echad v-arba'im yom shehaym chamishah shavuot veshishah yamim la-omer.
[Today is forty-one days which are five weeks and six days of the Omer.]

24 May 2006; Wednesday night: Hayom shnayim v-arba'im yom shehaym shishah shavuot la-omer.
[Today is forty-two days which are six weeks of the Omer.]

25 May 2006; Thursday night: Hayom shloshah v-arba'im yom shehaym shishah shavuot veyom echad la-omer.
[Today is forty-three days which are six weeks and one day of the Omer.]

26 May 2006; Friday night (Shabbes): Hayom arba'ah v-arba'im yom shehaym shishah shavuot ushnay yamim la-omer.
[Today is forty-four days which are six weeks and two days of the Omer.]

27 May 2006; Saturday night: Hayom chamishah v-arba'im yom shehaym shishah shavuot ushloshah yamim la-omer.
[Today is forty-five days which are six weeks and three days of the Omer.]

28 May 2006; Sunday night: Hayom shishah v-arba'im yom shehaym shishah shavuot ve-arba'ah yamim la-omer.
[Today is forty-six days which are six weeks and four days of the Omer.]

29 May 2006; Monday night: Hayom shiv'ah v-arba'im yom shehaym shishah shavuot vechamishah yamim la-omer.
[Today is forty-seven days which are six weeks and five days of the Omer.]

30 May 2006; Tuesday night: Hayom shmonah v-arba'im yom shehaym shishah shavuot veshishah yamim la-omer.
[Today is forty-eight days which are six weeks and six days of the Omer.]

31 May 2006; Wednesday night: Hayom tish'ah v-arba'im yom shehaym shiv'ah shavuot la-omer.
[Today is forty-nine days which are seven weeks of the Omer.]

1 June 2006; Thursday night: Erev Shavuot. Have some cheesecake and blintzim, you look a little peaked.

Search This Blog

GRITS AND TOFU

Like most Americans, I have a list of people who should be peacefully retired from public service and thereafter kept away from their desks,...